The structure of first person and second person alternating narratives and times (one in the present, one looking back) is what many on the panel liked, and others found difficult. Either way, we felt the characters were so well developed and believable in this book that it was the most impressive, in that, sense for reality.
|
Geoghegan made a real attempt to remain balanced on a topic that's often reported with bias, tying everything back to Scotland's referendum. Other places and people were given their moment, but the language didn't always match the topic at hand. It was, however, easy to read even for those not into politics.
|
This is creepy and made us feel uncomfortable, but in an enjoyable way. Despite the mass of stories they all flow together, with a Pan's Labyrinth/Coraline vibe to much of it. Even in the shortest stories, the characters are well-formed, and unlike anything we'd read. Ambitious and engaging.
|
|
|